Friday, October 12, 2012

Week 8 Harry Potter's Girl Trouble

Schoefer identifies some positive characteristics of the Harry Potter series such as: "the glittering mystery, nail biting suspense, compelling language and colorful imagery, magical feats of juxtapose with real life concern."  Her central point to her essay is that only the men are strong and brave and the women cower in fear and are generally helpless.  She starts off by saying "Believe me, i tried as hard as i could to ignore the sexism,  I really wanted to love Harry Potter.  But how could I?"  At the beginning she does give the book some credit but she points out all of the things that portray it as sexist. And of course to help make her point seem stronger she leaves out key details of events and people.  She fails to mention how Hermione's brains and knowledge saved Ron and Harry's lives.  Or mention anything positive about Professor McGonagall, who is seen as a strong, wise mother figure who helps Harry many times.  She also fails to mention anything about Dolorus Umbridge, while yes she is evil she is still a main character in the later books.  She becomes the Headmistress of Hogwarts and is someone no one wants to cross.  She uses examples of Hermione, Ginny, and McGonagall to support her claim the women are always beneath men in the Harry Potter series.  While yes if you look to closely at this series and read something of every little thing you will find some kind of sexist or discrimination   But the Harry Potter series wasn't created to be sexist, it was created to entertain children and provide an escape from reality.  And furthermore why would J.K. Rolling(a woman) write a sexist book against women?

3 comments:

  1. I feel that you answered the questions really well. I don't really see some of her points in this article because I feel that the women totally depended on the guys in the story. I saw the girls as strong and amazing. I agree with you were you say what she fails to mention about what Hermione dose to help the guys get out of trouble.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you, if you have never read the books or seen the movies and read her article you might look at harry potter as sexiest. But for people who already seen the movies know that she was over exaggerating a bit much. You're right, why would a women write a sexist movie against women.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Keep in mind, the article was written when only the first three books were published. While I agree with a lot of your points, the author of the article couldn't have mentioned Dolores Umbridge as that character hadn't been published yet. Overall, I agree and I don't believe that J.K. Rowling is sexist. Frankly, the books develop many female characters as the series progresses. The initial three books are relatively short and are developing the premise - so they leave a lot of character development out.

    ReplyDelete