·
Deer population needs to be controlled.
·
The writer explains how the over-population of
dears affects the lives of warblers and endangering the rest of our
flora and fauna, including valuable timber and invaluable songbirds. The strongest argument would be the
deforestation from the dears. The weakest would be the effects of lives of
warblers.
·
Fewer dears, stop management of forest, fencing
a forest.
She could have addressed a forest good for the warblers.
·
The conclusion says that seeking
balance and managing public land for fewer deer would be best. Hunting,
bringing wolves and mountain lions, and fencing the forest.
·
Warblers eat and makes their nest in canopies, hides
their nests in dense vegetation on or near the ground
Numerous dears are feeding themselves
through the forest.
Deer are eating dense vegetation where
warblers nest.
I agree with what you said about this article. I think a point the writer missed was the fact that changing the environment that some animals are in can cause some animals to die off to much and then they become endangered. So some of her/his ways of solving the problem can cause much worse problems in the long run. The hunters can't do much because there is only a certain time period to hunt deer and there are rules on how many they can hunt.
ReplyDelete