1. Yes, the thesis is very clearly stated. The author doesn't give an opposing view thesis, he just simply states that "Despite expense, colleges should make every effort to create green campuses because by doing so they will improve their own educational environment, ensure their own institution's survival, and help solve global climate crisis".
2. Yes, the first topic sentence talks about how schools can save money on operating costs, therefore making the school more competitive in the long-term. The second topic sentence states that while greening can be expensive, a green commitment can also help schools remain financially viable. Lastly, the third topic sentence basically says that "Going Green" can get students involved and give them the power to make the difference.
3. No the author should have added additional information about environmental changes and how will greening affect use directly.
4. The author does refute opposing arguments effectively by giving examples throughout the passage to support each opposing side. He then proves why you should agree with his opinion by showing that the benefit of greening.
5. Yes, all the sentences flow smoothly and effectively.
6. Yes, the article has no vague words
7.The author does use a strong concluding statement. He clearly states his argument and lets it be known that he is "Pro-Green". The writer presaudes the reader to take action and become green.
No comments:
Post a Comment